UMN Knowledge Center

Pengaruh profesionalisme, etika profesi, pengalaman dan pengetahuan mendeteksi kekeliruan oleh auditor terhadap pertimbangan tingkat materialitas

Usain, Cornelius, Celvin (2014) Pengaruh profesionalisme, etika profesi, pengalaman dan pengetahuan mendeteksi kekeliruan oleh auditor terhadap pertimbangan tingkat materialitas. Bachelor Thesis thesis, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.

[img]
Preview
Text
HALAMAN AWAL.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (845kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB I.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (736kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB II.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (746kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB III.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (767kB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (831kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
BAB V.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (706kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (708kB) | Preview

Abstract

The The The objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using a survey method a survey methoda survey method a survey methoda survey methoda survey methoda survey methoda survey method a survey method to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. The result ofThe result of The result ofThe result ofThe result ofThe result ofThe result of The result ofThe result of this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to judgement of materjudgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of materiality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level simultaneously.simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor Thesis)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance > HJ9701-9940 Public accounting. Auditing
Divisions: Fakultas Bisnis > Program Studi Akuntansi
Depositing User: mr admin umn
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2017 02:29
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2017 07:31
URI: http://kc.umn.ac.id/id/eprint/561

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item