Usain, Cornelius, Celvin (2014) Pengaruh profesionalisme, etika profesi, pengalaman dan pengetahuan mendeteksi kekeliruan oleh auditor terhadap pertimbangan tingkat materialitas. Bachelor Thesis thesis, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.
![[img]](https://kc.umn.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
HALAMAN AWAL.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (845kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (736kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (746kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (767kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (831kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (706kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (708kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The The The objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect objective of this research was to examine the effect professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professionalism, professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using error toward judgement of materiality level. The research was conducted using a survey method a survey methoda survey method a survey methoda survey methoda survey methoda survey methoda survey method a survey method to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. to provide the questionnaires auditors in audit firms. Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The Data used in this study was primary data, id est: questionnaires. The respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using respondents in this study were 109. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. multiple linear regression. The result ofThe result of The result ofThe result ofThe result ofThe result ofThe result of The result ofThe result of this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant this study were (1) professionalism had significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not influence toward judgement of materiality level; (2) professional ethics had not significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (3) auditor’s experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence towardexperience had not significant influence toward experience had not significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; judgement of materiality level; (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of (4) auditor’s knowledge for error had significant influence toward judgement of materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, materiality level; (5) professionalism, professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and professional ethics, experience and auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to auditor’s knowledge for error had significant to judgement of materjudgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of mater judgement of materiality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level iality level simultaneously.simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously. simultaneously.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor Thesis) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 170 Ethics > 174 Occupational ethics (CSR, business ethics, ethics of work, professional ethics) 600 Technology (Applied Sciences) > 650 Management and Public Relations > 657 Accounting > 657.45 Auditing |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Business > Accounting |
| Depositing User: | Administrator UMN Library |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Jul 2017 02:29 |
| Last Modified: | 26 May 2023 06:16 |
| URI: | https://kc.umn.ac.id/id/eprint/561 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
